China Says Killing Okay Because of Global Warming
From Reuters AlertNet, found via Drudge Report. China is now claiming, in an effort to demonstrate that they are doing enough about “global warming” that their one-child policy helps the environment. They insist that the one-child policy has prevented about 300 million births, the population of the U.S.
And we have news stories treating what they are saying as actually having a shred of credibility. While news should be objective, there is a point where the objectivity of the news only serves to demonstrate to us how sick the world’s culture has gotten, that we place concerns about a hypothetical disaster which has mountains of proof both for and against over concerns about the murder of innocent human beings. There is little argument left as to whether a baby inside the womb can be considered a person, and therefore can be little argument left as to whether abortion is murder. This is the statement they are making. Murder is justifiable because of a “scientific” theory that claims disaster will come and is well-known largely because of the rantings, screamings, and ravings of leftist leaders. Not only is murder acceptable, but mass murder is acceptable. I’d call three HUNDRED million innocent deaths mass murder, wouldn’t you?
And now we’re saying this is in the name of protecting the environment? I’m very tempted to use some expletives in describing those who are making this argument. All for an unproven theory? Make no mistake, as long as these kinds of arguments are heard and this kind of behavior is condoned, China will NEVER be a truly successful nation, and for that matter, America will go right down the tubes as well. If it is acceptable to kill clearly alive human beings inside the womb for the sake of “the environment,” what will stop them from killing clearly alive human beings outside the womb for whatever reason strikes their fancy to excuse it?
Filed under: Main on August 30th, 2007